e-Pedagogium 2008, 8(1):35-47

The Role of Task Analyses in Effective Instruction

John H. Hummel, David M. Monetti, and William G. Huitt
John H. Hummel PhD., Department of Psychology and Counseling, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, GA, USA, Email: jhummel@valdosta.edu
David M. Monetti PhD., Department of Psychology and Counseling, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, GA, USA, Email:dmmonett@valdosta.edu
William G. Huitt PhD., Department of Psychology and Counseling, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, GA, USA, Email: whuitt@valdosta.edu

Klíčová slova: Task analysis, cognitive task analysis, creative task analysis, teaching skills, lessons, achievement

The purpose of this paper is to discuss how task analysis (TA) can be utilized to help pre-service and practicing teachers to generate lesson plans that can positively impact the achievement of students. The connection between state standards, ordering of learning objectives, task analyses, and assessments are described. Different approaches to constructing and implementing TAs are presented. While TAs for the psychomotor domain are briefly described the emphasis is on developing such analyses for outcomes associated with the cognitive domain. Examples are provided that demonstrate the process of developing TAs for a Georgia Performance Standard, and classic guidelines for creating task analyses are reviewed.

Zveřejněno: 1. únor 2008  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hummel, J.H., Monetti, D.M., & Huitt, A.W.G. (2008). The Role of Task Analyses in Effective Instruction. e-Pedagogium8(1), 35-47
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. BATRA, M., & BATRA, V. Comparison between forward chaining and backward chaining techniques in children with mental retardation [Electronic version]. The Indian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2005-2006, 37(3), 57-63.
  2. BLOOM, B. S., ENGELHART, M. D., FURST, E. J., HILL, W. H., & KRATHWOHL, D. R.. Taxonomy of education objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay, 1956.
  3. CAMERON, M. J., SHAPIRO, R. L., & AINSLEIGH, S. A.. Bicycle riding: Pedaling made posible through positive behavioral interventions [Electronic version]. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2005, 7, 153-158. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  4. GAGE, N., & BERLINER, D. Educational psychology (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1992.
  5. GAGNE, R. Military training and principles of learning. American Psychologist, 17, 1962, 263-276. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. GILBERT, T. F., & GILBERT, M. B. Potential contributions of performance science to education. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1992, 25, 43-49. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  7. GRONLUND, N. E. Assessment of student achievement (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1998.
  8. GRONLUND, N. E. How to write and use instructional objectives (6th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2000.
  9. HICKMAN, M. R., & ANDERSON, C. R. Evaluating instructional materials for learning disabled children [Electron version]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979, 12(5), 75-79. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  10. HUGHES, S. Another look at task analysis [Electronic version]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1982, 15, 273-275. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  11. RESNICK, L. B., WANG, M. C., & KAPLAN, J. Task analysis in curriculum design: A hierarchically sequenced introductory mathematics curriculum. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973, 6, 679-710. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  12. SIEGEL, E., & SIEGEL, R. 10 guidelines for writing instructional sequences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1975, 8, 15-21. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  13. SLAVIN, R. E. Educational psychology: Theory into practice, (8th ed.).Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2006.
  14. WILIAMS, G. E., & CUVO, A. J. Training apartment upkeep skills to rehabilitation clients: A comparison of task analytic strategies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1986, 19, 39-51. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  15. YATES, K. A. Towards a taxonomy of cognitive task analysis methods:A search for cognition and task analysis interactions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 2007. Retrieved October 3, 2007 from http://www.cogtech.usc.edu/publications/yates_dissertation_2007.pdf

Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.