e-Pedagogium 2013, 13(3):68-80 | DOI: 10.5507/epd.2013.033

The Characteristics of Giftedness Scale for preschool age - similarities and differencies in preschool children giftedness assessment between nursery teachers and parents

Jana Marie Havigerová, Jiří Haviger, Kateřina Juklová
PhDr. Jana Marie Havigerová, Ústav preprimární a primární edukace, Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Hradec Králové, Rokitanského 62, 500 03 Hradec Králové, e-mail: jana.havigerova@uhk.cz

The paper deals with the possibility of using a screening method for the assessment of intellectual giftedness in the preschool age by two groups of persons - nursery teachers and parents. It presents The Characteristics of Giftedness Scale (CGS) for preschool children from Linda Silverman and its translated Czech version that was being verified from the aspect of parallel validity with a standardized IQ test. This CGS was filled in by 2 experienced nursery teachers and by parents of 56 preschool children. Their assessments were analysed from the aspect of similarity and diversity. The results confirm the assumption that parents mostly tend to overestimate their children, point out particular differences in assessment of nursery teachers and parents and consider their possible causes.

Keywords: characteristics of Giftedness Scale, preschool children, assessment of giftedness, parents, nursery teachers

Published: June 1, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Havigerová, J.M., Haviger, J., & Juklová, K. (2013). The Characteristics of Giftedness Scale for preschool age - similarities and differencies in preschool children giftedness assessment between nursery teachers and parents. e-Pedagogium13(3), 68-80. doi: 10.5507/epd.2013.033
Download citation

References

  1. Burešová, I., Havigerová J. M., & Šimíková, M. (2012). Information Behaviour of Gifted Children - The Qualitative Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 242-246. Go to original source...
  2. Čihounková, J. (2012). Možnosti identifikace nadaných předškolních dětí rodiči. Disertační práce. Fakulta sociálních studií Masarykovy univerzity. Vedoucí práce doc. Mgr. Šárka Portešová, Ph.D. Brno: MU.
  3. Daniels, S., Piechowski, M. M. (2008). Living with Intensity: Understanding the Sensitivity, Excitability, and Emotional Development of Gifted Children, Adolescents, and Adults. Scottsdale: Great Potential Press. Go to original source...
  4. Frič, P. a kol. (2008). Vůdcovství českých elit. Praha: Grada.
  5. Gagné, F. (1994). Are teachers really poor talent detectors? Comments on Pegnato and Birch's (1959) study of the effectivness and efficiency of various identification techniques. iGifted Child Quarterly. 38, 124-126. Go to original source...
  6. Gillernová, I., Kebza, V., Rymeš, M. a kol. (2011). Psychologické aspekty změn v české společnosti. Člověk na přelomu tisíciletí. Praha: Grada, edice Psyché.
  7. Hall, E. G. & Skinner, N. (1980). Strategies for parents of the Gifted and Talented. New York: Teachers College Press.
  8. Hartman, M. L., Drew, C. J., Egan, W. (2011). Human Exceptionality: School, Community, and Family. 10th edition. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
  9. Havigerová, J. M. & HAVIGER, J. (2012). Questions in the School. World academy of science and technology, 66, 449-452.
  10. Havigerová, J. M., Haviger, J., & Juklová, K. (2013). When parents and teachers assess intellectual giftedness of preschool children. The New Educational Review, v tisku.
  11. Heffernan, H., Todd, V., E. (1960). The kindergarten teacher. University of Minnesota: Health.
  12. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C., G. (Eds.) (2002). Theory and Research in Educational Administration. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
  13. Jensen, A. R. (2012). Educability and group differences. Abington: Rouledge, 2012. Go to original source...
  14. Kotková, E. (2011). Identifikace rozumově nadaných dětí v předškolním věku. [Diplomová práce]. Hradec Králové: Pedagogická fakulta Univerzity Hradec Králové, 2011. 71 s.
  15. Laznibatová, J. (2007). Nadané dieťa - jeho vývin, vzdelávanie a podporovanie. Bratislava: IRIS.
  16. Martincová, N. (2013). NOMI - screeningová metoda. [online]. [cit. 2013-28-04]. Dostupné z: http://www.nadanedite.eu/index.php/aktivity-pro-ucitele/110-nomi-screeningova-metoda.html.
  17. McBee, M. T. (2006). A descriptive analysis referral sources for gifted identification screening by race and socioeconomic status. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education. 17, 103-111. Go to original source...
  18. Melhuish, E. C., Petrogiannis, K. (2006). Early Childhood Care And Education: International Perspectives. New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  19. Oakes, P. B. (1988). The Relationship Between the Authority Orientation of Kindergarten Teachers and Choice of Teaching Strategies. Contribution to the School of Graduate Studies, Indiana State University.
  20. Omer, H. (2010). The New Authority: Family, School, and Community. New York: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  21. Pierce, R.L., Adams, C. M., Spiers Neumeister, K. L., Cassady, J. C., Dixon, F. A., & CrossT. L. (2007). Development of an identification procedur efor a large urban school corporation: Identifying culturally diverse and academically gifted elementary students. Roeper Review. 29, 113-118. Go to original source...
  22. Pfeiffer, S. I. (Ed.) (2008). Handbook of Giftedness in Children. Psycho-educational Theory, Research and Best Practices. New York: Springer Science + Bussiness Media. Go to original source...
  23. Portešová, Š. (2009). Skryté nadání: psychologická specifika rozumově nadaných žáků s dyslexií. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. Institut výzkumu dětí, mládeže a rodiny, 2009.
  24. Pýchová, I. (1997). Jazykově nadaný žák. Návrh pedagogické metody identifikace cizojazyčného nadání. Pedagogika. 47, 4, 355-371.
  25. Renzulli, J. S., & Delcourt, M. A. B. (1997). The legacy and logic of research on the identification of gifted persons. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 20-23. Go to original source...
  26. Silverman, L. K. (1993). Characteristics of giftedness scale. Denver: Gifted Developement Center.
  27. Slezáčková, A. (2012). Průvodce pozitivní psychologií: nové přístupy, aktuální poznatky, praktické aplikace. Praha: Grada.
  28. Speirs Neumeister, K. L., Adams, C. M., Pierce, R. L., Cassady, J. C., & Dixon, F. A. (2007). Fourth-grade teachers' perceptions of giftedness: Implications for identifying and serving diverse gifted students. Journal for the Education of Gifted. 30, 479-499. Go to original source...
  29. Talay-Ongan, A. & Ap E. A. (Eds.). (2005). Child Development and Teaching Young Children. South Melbourne: Cengage Learning.
  30. Werner, I. B., Reynolds, W. M. & Miller, G. E. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of Psychology: Educational Psychology. Vol. 7. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  31. Winebrenner, S., Brulles, D., Kingore, B. (2008). The Cluster Grouping Handbook: A Schoolwide Model: How to Challenge Gifted Students and Improve Achievement for All. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.