e-Pedagogium 2021, 21(3):70-84 | DOI: 10.5507/epd.2021.025

Preprimary education in Czech Republic, England and New Zealand

Ondřej Koželuh
Kontakt:
Ústav výzkumu a rozvoje vzdělávání, Myslíkova 7, 110 00, Praha 1

The aim of the presented study is to compare the pre-primary sphere of education in all three countries, to compare identical and different aspects of education systems and to describe the tested phenomena of pre-primary education of individual countries based on agreement, similarity or difference in order to find inspiring elements. The data needed for the analysis will be taken from the OECD and Eurydice databases, the pre-primary education curricula of the countries concerned and the official materials published by the individual ministers. Research design is desk research. The comparison showed that each surveyed country can in some respects serve as an inspiration for the others (eg Compulsory last preschool year in the Czech Republic, high financial subsidy from the budget to the pre-primary sphere in New Zealand and the existence of a separate document (Early education and childcare) connecting school and family in England).

Keywords: Curriculum, preprimary education, Czech Republic, England, New Zealand.

Received: February 3, 2021; Revised: August 18, 2021; Accepted: August 30, 2021; Prepublished online: August 30, 2021; Published: December 22, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Koželuh, O. (2021). Preprimary education in Czech Republic, England and New Zealand. e-Pedagogium21(3), 70-84. doi: 10.5507/epd.2021.025
Download citation

References

  1. Belsky, J., Vandell, D. L., Burchinal, M., Clarke-Stewart, K. A., McCartney, K., Owen, M. T., & NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2007). Are there long-term effects of early child care? Child development, 78(2), 681-701. Go to original source...
  2. Bennett, J. (2005). Curriculum issues in national policy-making, European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 13(2), 5-23. Go to original source...
  3. Bennett, J. (2011). Early childhood education and care systems: Issue of tradition and governance. Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development, 1-5.
  4. Bertrand, J. (2007). Preschool programs: Effective curriculum. Comments on Kagan and Kauerz and on Schweinhart. Encyclopedia on early childhood development, 1-7.
  5. Bertrand, Y. (1998). Soudobé teorie vzdělávaní. Portál.
  6. Česká školní inspekce. (2020, December 12). Kvalita a efektivita vzdělávání a vzdělávací soustavy ve školním roce 2019/2020. http://www.csicr.cz/html/2020/Vyrocni_zprava_CSI_2019_2020/html5/index.html?&locale=CSY&pn=1
  7. Český statistický úřad. (2018, August 31). Školy a školská zařízení - školní rok 2017/18. https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/blizi-se-novy-skolni-rok
  8. Deater-Deckard, K., Pinkerton, R., & Scarr, S. (1996). Child care quality and children's behavioral adjustment: A four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(8), 937-948. Go to original source...
  9. Department of Education. (2017, March 3). Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/596629/EYFS_STATUTORY_FRAMEWORK_2017.pdf
  10. Department of Education. (2018, June 18). Early education and childcare. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/718179/Early_ education_and_childcare-statutory_guidance.pdf
  11. Erikson, E. (2014). Životní cyklus rozšířený a dokončený: devět věků člověka. Portál.
  12. Eurydice. (n. d.). Czech Republic Overview. Retrieved March 22, 2021, from https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/ national-policies/eurydice/content/czech-republic_en
  13. Eurydice. (n.d.). United Kingdom - England Overview. Retrieved March 22, 2021, from https://eacea.ec. europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/united-kingdom-england_en
  14. Greger, D., Simonová J., & Straková J., ed. (2015). Spravedlivý start? nerovné šance v předškolním vzdělávání a při přechodu na základní školu. Univerzita Karlova, Pedagogická fakulta.
  15. Holec, J., & Dvořák, D. (2017). Curriculum for excellence: Kurikulum založené na kompetencích a zkušenosti z jeho implementace. Pedagogika, 67(1). Go to original source...
  16. Janík, T. & Knecht, P. (2007). Pedagogický výzkum a kurikulární reforma české školy. Sborník ČAPV 2007. http://www.capv.cz/index.php/cz/2007/45-sborniky-capv/archiv-sborniku/2007/1068-pedagogicky-vyzkum-a-kurikularni-reforma-ceske-skoly
  17. Kelly, A. V. (1999). The curriculum: Theory and practice. (4th ed.). Sage.
  18. Kwon, Y. (2002). Changing Curriculum for Early Childhood Education in England. Early Childhood Research & Practice. 4(2).
  19. Melhuish, E., Ereky-Stevens, K., Petrogiannis, K., Ariescu, A., Penderi, E., Rentzou, K., … & Leseman, P. (2015). A review of research on the effects of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) upon child development.
  20. Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí ČR. (2020, October 23). Dětské skupiny - jesle. https://www.mpsv.cz/documents/20142/225481/D%C4%9Btsk%C3%A9+skupiny+-+jesle_stanovisko+ MPSV.pdf/2bf0e3c4-c3ea-ad2b-21e8-4f97c237987c
  21. Ministry of Education. (2017). Te Whāriki. https://education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Early-Childhood/ELS-Te-Whariki-Early-Childhood-Curriculum-ENG-Web.pdf
  22. MŠMT, (2021) Strategie vzdělávací politiky České republiky do roku 2030+. Retrieved July 8, 2021, from https://www.edu.cz/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Strategie-2030.pdf
  23. Mutch, C. (2004). The Rise and Rise of Early Childhood Education in New Zealand. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education.
  24. OECD Data. (2016). Czech Republic. Retrieved March 22, 2021, from https://data.oecd.org/czech-republic.htm#profile-education
  25. OECD Data. (2016). Education resources - education spending. Retrieved March 22, 2021, from https://data.oecd.org/eduresource/education-spending.htm
  26. OECD Data. (2016). New Zealand. Retrieved March 22, 2021, from https://data.oecd.org/new- -zealand.htm#profile-education
  27. OECD Data. (2016). United Kingdom. Retrieved March 22, 2021, from https://data.oecd.org/united-kingdom.htm#profile-education
  28. Pépin, L. (2011). Education in the Lisbon Strategy: assessment and prospects. European Journal of Education, 46(1), 25-35. Go to original source...
  29. Piaget, J. & Inhelder B., (2014). Psychologie dítěte. Portál.
  30. Plug, C. [Country Plug]. (2015, April 4). How Pre-School Education works in England [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDzyttu7lGU&ab_channel=CountryPlug
  31. Průcha, J., Mareš, J., & Walterová E. (2003). Pedagogický slovník. (4th ed.) Portál.
  32. Průcha, J. (2016). Předškolní dítě a svět vzdělávání: přehled teorie, praxe a výzkumných poznatků. Wolters Kluwer.
  33. Rabušicová, M., & Záleská, K. (2016). Metodologické otázky srovnávací pedagogiky: podněty pro koncipování komparativních studií. Pedagogická orientace, 26(3), 346-378. Go to original source...
  34. Schleicher, A., (2019). PISA - Insights and Interpretations. Retrieved March 22, 2021, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf
  35. Smolíková, K., (2004). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro předškolní vzdělávání. Výzkumný ústav pedagogický.
  36. Syslová, Z., (2017) Učitel v předškolním vzdělávání a jeho příprava na profesi. Masarykova Univerzita. Go to original source...
  37. Taguma, M., Litjens, I., & Makowiecki, K. (2012a). Quality matters in early childhood education and care. Czech Republic: OECD. Go to original source...
  38. Taguma, M., Litjens, I., & Makowiecki, K. (2012b). Quality matters in early childhood education and care. New Zealand: OECD.
  39. Taguma, M., Litjens, I., & Makowiecki, K. (2012c). Quality matters in early childhood education and care. United Kingdom (England): OECD.
  40. Váňová, M. (1998). Teoretické a metodologické otázky srovnávací pedagogiky. Pedagogická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy.
  41. Vygotskij, L., (2017). Psychologie myšlení a řeči. Portál.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.