e-Pedagogium 2017, 17(2):15-24 | DOI: 10.5507/epd.2017.021

Comparative Children Literature: Aesthetic and Didactic Context

Imron Wakhid Harits
Imron Wakhid Harits, Ph.D., Trunojoyo University of Madura, Indonesia, Jl. Raya Telang Po. Box 02 Kamal, Bangkalan, Indonesia, Email: imronwakhidharits@gmail.com

Reading children literature is not merely deploying the cognitive activities for the learner's in the class, but reading children literature involves two important aspects to make the learners head on love affairs with reading activities, namely the emotional and intellectual aspects. This paper examines the engagement between the cognitive activities or the didactic process in the reading children literature and the connection between emotional and intellectual aspect or literary engagement. The notion of the comparative children literature is chosen as the reading materials because there are some profound element in it such as the adaptation and the transfer. The learners learn how among the children works in the world intertwine each other and have the dialogic process. As the comparative children literature, the learners unavoidably read their own traditional children stories too before they compare it with the stories from the different countries. The social and cultural point of view is the basic element finding its uniqueness among the stories.

Keywords: children literature, didactic, literary engagement, comparative children literature

Published: April 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Harits, I.W. (2017). Comparative Children Literature: Aesthetic and Didactic Context. e-Pedagogium17(2), 15-24. doi: 10.5507/epd.2017.021
Download citation

References

  1. Dixon-Kennedy, M. (1998). Encyclopedia of Russian & Slavic myth and legend. Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO.
  2. Němcová, B., Erben, K. J., & Müllerová, L. (2008). Czech fairytales. Praha: Vitalis.
  3. Gray, L. H., Macculloch, J. A. & Machál, J. (1918). The Mythology of All Races. Celtic and Slavic. Boston: Marshall Jones.
  4. Grenby, M. (2004). Children Literature. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
  5. Grilli, G. (1997). Myth, Symbol, and Meaning. New York: Routledge.
  6. Hakemulder, J. (2000). The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins Pub. Go to original source...
  7. Hunt, P. (ed.). (2003). Literature for Children. London: Routledge Go to original source...
  8. Luthi, M. (1982). European Folktale: Form and Nature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  9. Lynch-Brown, C., & Tomlinson, C. M. (1999). Essentials of children's literature. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  10. O'Sullivan, E. (2005). Comparative children's literature. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
  11. Reynolds, K. (January 01, 2004). A review of youth cultures: Texts, images and identities [Book Review]. Papers: Explorations into Children's Literature, 14, 1, 60-62.
  12. Sherman, J. (2008). Storytelling: An Encyclopedia of Mythology and Folklore. Armonk, N.Y: M.E. Sharpe.
  13. Uther, H.-J., Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, & Folklore Fellows. (2004). The types of International Folktales. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.
  14. Zipes, J. (January 01, 1987). Fairy Tale as Myth/Myth as Fairy Tale. Children's Literature Association Quarterly, 1, 107-110. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.