e-Pedagogium 2014, 14(1):101-112 | DOI: 10.5507/epd.2014.009

Sekundárna socializácia do dobrovoľníckej organizácie

Peter Dolník
Mgr. Peter Dolník, Ústav pedagogických věd Filozofické fakulty Masarykovy Univerzity, Veveří 28, 602 00 Brno, E-mail: dolnik@phil.muni.cz

This paper describes how the individual socializes into the volunteer group. Empirical part reveals three stages of socialization: How the group learn the individual its norms, how the individual learns from the group and how this learning is evaluated. Socialization here is considered as learning to the norms of the group. The norms here are created by participants and they are testing them in pleasant and friendly environment which is open for experimentation with their creativity and also with their social identity and role. Individuals here learn for particular role and position in organization, they learn to work in the group, they learn responsibility and other soft skills. Learning here is supported with individual's emotional commitment which creates the members of the organization.

Keywords: secondary socialization, norms, social learning, student organization

Published: February 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dolník, P. (2014). Sekundárna socializácia do dobrovoľníckej organizácie. e-Pedagogium, 14(1), 101-112. doi: 10.5507/epd.2014.009
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bělohlávek, F. (1996). Organizační chování: jak se každý den chovají spolupracovníci, nadřízení, podřízení, obchodní partneři či zákazníci. 1. vyd. Olomouc: Rubico.
    2. Berns, R. (2001). Child, family, school, community: Socialization and support. Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers.
    3. Brown, R. (2000). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    4. Diasio, F. (2010). AMARC and more than 25 years of community media activism. Telematics and Informatics, 27, 2, 193-195. Go to original source...
    5. Haski-Leventhal, D., & Bargal, D. (2008). The volunteer stages and transitions model: Organizational socialization of volunteers. Human Relations, 61, 1, 67-102. Go to original source...
    6. Helus, Z. (1973). Psychologické problémy socializace osobnosti. Vyd. 1. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.
    7. Helus, Z. (2007). Sociální psychologie pro pedagogy. Vyd. 1. Praha: Grada.
    8. Keller, J. (2004). Úvod do sociologie. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
    9. Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Human Resource Management Review. 1, 1, 61-89. Go to original source...
    10. Levine, J. M. & Moreland, R. L. (1994). Group Socialization: Theory and Research. European Review of Social Psychology. 5, 1, 305-336. Go to original source...
    11. Nakonečný, M. (2005). Sociální psychologie organizace. Vyd. 1. Praha: Grada.
    12. Pol, M. (2007). Škola v proměnách. 1. vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
    13. Reichel, J. (2004). Kapitoly systematické sociologie. 1. vyd. Praha: Eurolex Bohemia.
    14. Švyříček, R. & ŠEĎOVÁ, K. (2007). Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách. Vyd. 1. Praha: Portál.
    15. Tyson, S. & Jackson, T. (1997). Organizační chování. Vyd. 1. Praha: Grada.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content